Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning

Received: 21 July 2024     Accepted: 10 August 2024     Published: 30 August 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Aim: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Annual Operational Planning (AOP) process, a key health sector planning and harmonization approach, in Kebbi State, Nigeria, from 2020 to 2024, focusing on nine optimal planning parameters: state ownership, stakeholder participation, sector harmonization, evidence-based, timeliness, executive sign-off, quarterly tracking, dissemination, and sustainability. Methods: Review of AOP program reports, state-relevant reports, and stakeholders’ interviews. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates quantitative data derived from secondary sources like annual reports and policy documents with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Descriptive statistics and time-series analysis are used for quantitative data to study progress and trends in each milestone, while thematic analysis of interview transcripts helps to elucidate factors influencing implementation and outcomes. Results: Findings highlight a progressive improvement in the annual operational planning across several of the planning parameters over the years from the baseline in 2020, including in participatory engagement of the lower levels of the health sector (bottom-up approach), using evidence to inform planning; timely development of the AOP to inform health budget; and regular tracking of the plan. However, challenges persist in the government funding of stakeholders’ engagement, particularly the bottom-up approach at the Local Government Health Authorities (LGAs) level, which may affect the inclusiveness of the process in the future. Conclusion: The study concludes that the annual operational planning in Kebbi State has seen notable improvement across multiple planning parameters, assuring the effectiveness and sustainability of the process as a key planning tool. However, allocating adequate resources, including budget and human resources, to facilitate a participatory approach in the AOP development process is critical for continuous success. This study contributes to the broader discourse on health sector planning in developing contexts, offering valuable insights for policymakers, health managers, and stakeholders in designing and implementing effective and harmonized health plans.

Published in Science Journal of Public Health (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14
Page(s) 144-151
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Annual Operational Plan (AOP), Strategic Planning, Health Sector, Kebbi State, Nigeria

References
[1] Corlis, Joseph, et al. "A roadmap for implementing change in costing capacity and practices: Improving cost analyses of HIV services and the use of cost information in strategic planning and program management." Gates Open Res 6.71 (2022): 71.
[2] Health Organization, W. "Guidance on developing a national deployment and vaccination plan for COVID-19 vaccines: interim guidance, 1 June 2021." 2021.
[3] Health Organization, W. "Pandemic influenza preparedness framework: partnership contribution high-level implementation plan III 2024-2030." 2023.
[4] Ede, James D., et al. "Translating scientific advances in the AOP framework to decision making for nanomaterials." Nanomaterials 10.6 (2020): 1229.
[5] Chauhan, Vinita, et al. "Bringing together scientific disciplines for collaborative undertakings: a vision for advancing the adverse outcome pathway framework." International Journal of Radiation Biology 97.4 (2021): 431-441.
[6] Malakoane, B., et al. "Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: A situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening." BMC Health Services Research 20 (2020): 1-14.
[7] Salmon, W. "The Corporate Transformation of Health Care: Part 1: Issues and Directions." 2020.
[8] Kurnia, Sherah, et al. "Stakeholder engagement in enterprise architecture practice: What inhibitors are there?." Information and software technology 134(2021): 106536.
[9] Chua, Alvin Qijia, et al. "An analysis of national action plans on antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia using a governance framework approach." The Lancet Regional Health–Western Pacific 7 (2021).
[10] Soliman, M. H. A. "The Toyota way to effective strategy deployment: how organizations can focus energy on key priorities through Hoshin Kanri to achieve the business goals." Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning, 2020.
[11] Pozzi, R., Rossi, T., and Secchi, R. "Industry 4.0 technologies: critical success factors for implementation and improvements in manufacturing companies." Production Planning & Control, 2023.
[12] Durach, Christian F., and Leopoldo Gutierrez. "“Hello, this is your AI co-pilot”–operational implications of artificial intelligence chatbots." International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 54.3 (2024): 229-246.
[13] Atta, Kabiru, et al. "Participatory approaches to programme design, planning and early implementation: experiences from a safe surgery project in Nigeria." Health Policy and Planning 39.2 (2024): 233-246.
[14] Onwujekwe, Obinna, et al. "An analysis of urban policies and strategies on health and nutrition in Nigeria." Urban Research & Practice 16.1 (2023): 66-91.
[15] Ibeneme, Sunny, et al. "Strengthening capacities among digital health leaders for the development and implementation of national digital health programs in Nigeria." BMC proceedings. Vol. 14. BioMed Central, 2020.
[16] Omiunu, Ohiocheoya, and Ifeanyichukwu Azuka Aniyie. "Sub-national Involvement in Nigeria's Foreign Relations Law: An appraisal of the heterodoxy between theory and practice." African Journal of International and Comparative Law 30.2 (2022): 252-269.
[17] Omiunu, O. O. and Aniyie, I. A. "Sub-national involvement in Nigeria's Foreign Relations Law: An appraisal of the heterodoxy between theory and practice." 2021.
[18] Raimi, O. M., Sawyerr, O. H., Ezekwe, C. I., and Salako, G. "… metals concentration, seasonal variation and human health risk assessment in drinking water quality in Ebocha-Obrikom Oil and Gas Area of Rivers State, Nigeria." medRxiv, 2021.
[19] Martinus, Kirsten, Julia Loginova, and Thomas Sigler. "Scale as a lens to understand resource economies in the global periphery." Resource Peripheries in the Global Economy: Networks, Scales, and Places of Extraction (2021): 87-108.
[20] Anaemene, B. U. "From Social Justice to Economic Logic: The World Health Organization and Health Sector Reform in Nigeria, 1993–2007." International Journal of Health Services, 2020.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Gulma, K. A. (2024). Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning. Science Journal of Public Health, 12(4), 144-151. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Gulma, K. A. Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning. Sci. J. Public Health 2024, 12(4), 144-151. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Gulma KA. Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning. Sci J Public Health. 2024;12(4):144-151. doi: 10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14,
      author = {Kabiru Abubakar Gulma},
      title = {Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning
    },
      journal = {Science Journal of Public Health},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {144-151},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sjph.20241204.14},
      abstract = {Aim: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Annual Operational Planning (AOP) process, a key health sector planning and harmonization approach, in Kebbi State, Nigeria, from 2020 to 2024, focusing on nine optimal planning parameters: state ownership, stakeholder participation, sector harmonization, evidence-based, timeliness, executive sign-off, quarterly tracking, dissemination, and sustainability. Methods: Review of AOP program reports, state-relevant reports, and stakeholders’ interviews. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates quantitative data derived from secondary sources like annual reports and policy documents with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Descriptive statistics and time-series analysis are used for quantitative data to study progress and trends in each milestone, while thematic analysis of interview transcripts helps to elucidate factors influencing implementation and outcomes. Results: Findings highlight a progressive improvement in the annual operational planning across several of the planning parameters over the years from the baseline in 2020, including in participatory engagement of the lower levels of the health sector (bottom-up approach), using evidence to inform planning; timely development of the AOP to inform health budget; and regular tracking of the plan. However, challenges persist in the government funding of stakeholders’ engagement, particularly the bottom-up approach at the Local Government Health Authorities (LGAs) level, which may affect the inclusiveness of the process in the future. Conclusion: The study concludes that the annual operational planning in Kebbi State has seen notable improvement across multiple planning parameters, assuring the effectiveness and sustainability of the process as a key planning tool. However, allocating adequate resources, including budget and human resources, to facilitate a participatory approach in the AOP development process is critical for continuous success. This study contributes to the broader discourse on health sector planning in developing contexts, offering valuable insights for policymakers, health managers, and stakeholders in designing and implementing effective and harmonized health plans.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Charting the Course: A Policy Perspective on the Evolution of Kebbi State's Health Sector Annual Operational Planning
    
    AU  - Kabiru Abubakar Gulma
    Y1  - 2024/08/30
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14
    T2  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JF  - Science Journal of Public Health
    JO  - Science Journal of Public Health
    SP  - 144
    EP  - 151
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-7950
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjph.20241204.14
    AB  - Aim: This study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Annual Operational Planning (AOP) process, a key health sector planning and harmonization approach, in Kebbi State, Nigeria, from 2020 to 2024, focusing on nine optimal planning parameters: state ownership, stakeholder participation, sector harmonization, evidence-based, timeliness, executive sign-off, quarterly tracking, dissemination, and sustainability. Methods: Review of AOP program reports, state-relevant reports, and stakeholders’ interviews. Employing a mixed-methods research design, the study integrates quantitative data derived from secondary sources like annual reports and policy documents with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders. Descriptive statistics and time-series analysis are used for quantitative data to study progress and trends in each milestone, while thematic analysis of interview transcripts helps to elucidate factors influencing implementation and outcomes. Results: Findings highlight a progressive improvement in the annual operational planning across several of the planning parameters over the years from the baseline in 2020, including in participatory engagement of the lower levels of the health sector (bottom-up approach), using evidence to inform planning; timely development of the AOP to inform health budget; and regular tracking of the plan. However, challenges persist in the government funding of stakeholders’ engagement, particularly the bottom-up approach at the Local Government Health Authorities (LGAs) level, which may affect the inclusiveness of the process in the future. Conclusion: The study concludes that the annual operational planning in Kebbi State has seen notable improvement across multiple planning parameters, assuring the effectiveness and sustainability of the process as a key planning tool. However, allocating adequate resources, including budget and human resources, to facilitate a participatory approach in the AOP development process is critical for continuous success. This study contributes to the broader discourse on health sector planning in developing contexts, offering valuable insights for policymakers, health managers, and stakeholders in designing and implementing effective and harmonized health plans.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections